Alcoholism drug testing is becoming more prevalent both at the workplace, in individual homes, and in some higher learning institutions. There are several types of alcohol testing kits available on the market now. The alcohol test kits range from ones that utilize saliva or urine to screen for toxins to the more traditional breath analyzer or a blood test. Generally all these methods are considered simple, fairly accurate (95-98% percent accuracy), and offer easily read results.
Having an alcohol testing kit in the privacy of the home offers many advantages, particularly to parents trying to curb underage drinking. By using the kit, a parent can either substantiate their concerns about hidden drinking, or discover that their worries were unfounded. However, buyers should be aware that alcoholism testing kits used at home may not work consistently, and not all kits are created equal.
Because parents may not know which testing kits are best, or how to collect samples properly, it’s possible to get a “false positive.” With this in mind, it’s worth considering having a professional perform an alcohol test in a controlled setting.
Additionally pressuring a child into home testing can cause serious family tension if not handled with great sensitivity. The websites asserting that random alcohol testing help prevent alcoholism seem to have no studies on which to base that claim. Nonetheless, if you choose to get a testing kit, make sure that the product has:
Saliva or breathalyzer testing are probably the best suited to home use, being less intrusive than blood tests or urine tests.
Alcoholism drug testing kits are one of the tools employers use to try and deter on-the-job drinking. Particularly in companies utilizing heavy equipment alcohol testing helps keep the job site safe, and co-workers out of the line of danger from an impaired operator.
Many companies now perform surprise alcoholism drug screens, and include this requirement in their policy and procedure manual. Employers know that on-the-job drinking leads to accidents, poor output, increased insurance claims and increased absenteeism. By including this information as policy, workers can then give informed consent to undergo the alcohol test whenever the company dictates.
It’s important to remember that the government and various regulatory agencies often have directives for alcohol testing as a mandated, standard practice. One example is that many school boards require on-going testing for school bus drivers. Similarly, anyone working for the department of transportation must be tested regularly.
Most companies consider the saliva test to be the most time and cost effective of the two options. Breathalyzers require 20 minutes and a second testing if the first proves positive. Saliva testing takes only 2 minutes.
Some learning institutions have begun screening new students for alcoholism. The University of California at Santa Barbara required that 2007 freshmen take an alcohol test and health assessment by a certain date. This was a requirement to continue with their studies. Cornell University took a different approach, requiring all incoming students to take an online course in the dangers of drinking.